Street Corruption, Anti-corruption Activist Sentenced to 17 Months Prison

Reaction Assembly Criminal Justice Corruption Court verdicts Semarang dropping one year and five months in prison to Budi Raharjo , one of Civil Servants in Jepara regency stuck corruption cases of road and canal in three places in Jepara regency .

The judge also fined Rp 50 million drop or the equivalent of two months of captivity. Budi Rahardjo stuck because the road case sitting as a project supervisor . He claimed to be watching the road until the road project working on three projects that do not fit with the Plan Cost Estimates (RAB ) .

There are three built with a budget of Rp 900 million from the regional budget allocation Pemprov Central Java in 2012 . Three Village area , among others, West Linton , West Linton and District Villages and Countryside Sidialit Bantong , Sub Batealit .
( read: blackthroat )

To give the verdict the judge concluded that the defendant with the other defendants were going to do the same job deviation . It is obvious that the defendant signed Budi project file is actually problematic. Working for the band was done by CV Honest Jaya Mandiri .

" State defendants participated in illegal acts of corruption do together as it is for the secondary claim to Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended and replaced the Law No. 20 of 2001 jo article 55 paragraph 1 of the 1st of the Penal Code , " the judge said triad read the verdict, Thursday ( 22/05/2014 ) .

Its own admission, since the student is to become civil activists who oppose the criminal acts of corruption. To that end , in this case himself feel beaten . Not only him, but also in large families .

In his defense, for example , the defendants claim to have the spirit of reform Budi high and still young . Due to this case, he and his family feel punished directly in the community.

However , the reason is not acceptable Budi judge. Judge triad say excuse used as an excuse corrector , which can not be grounds for removing criminal acts .

" Assembly judge legally and confident assertion that the defendant is prosecuted . That what the defendant was not served in the ground for corrector or forgiving can release from entrapment law. For that, the defendant should be sentenced , " he said.

Decision is to consider a few things . Action defendants who feel guilty for weight considerations . While elements of family obligations and has never been the case of extenuating punished . The two sides also still worried over court decides.

source:http://www.kompas.com/